2004-10-23 [wwwwwwwww]: "every time someone attacked us, we whooped'em" Actually, the Japanese were not whooped. They put up a stiff fight and the situation looked VERY bad for America MANY times. By no means did we "whoop" them. Also, if you think that attacking anyone who provokes you with all the resources you've got is the qualification that makes someone a good leader, then it is in fact yourself who is not looking at the facts. History and current events clearly illustrate that a leader must be able to do more than 1 thing "well".. if the term applies to Bush. You've seen the economy break down during his reign, you've seen global disquiet, you've seen mounting atrocities in third-world countries..

2004-10-23 [wwwwwwwww]: and all of this has happened during Bush's term. All he can offer is excuses, and no explanations to his foolish policies. I think it says something that the main argument for his campaign is "but Kerry is a hypocrite".. and if you examine that claim thoroughly you'll find that he is no less or more of one than any other politician. It's almost inevitable when your career is political, and it's the effort of the Bush campaign that has distorted it.. in essence creating a mountain of a mole-hill.

2004-11-14 [triad]: economical unrest. . . . well gee pah the WORLD TRADE CENTER, A HOMe TO MILLIONS OF DOLLARS AND TRADE BUISNESESS JUsT WENT DOWN. . . . . . . how bout you stop making excuses

2004-12-09 [Balthizar]: its more hten that, over three tousand people died in that bombing,alot of them americans,thats what hte fuss is about,suer were mad about it econimcly, but were pissed about it death wise

2004-12-09 [Doormat]: If Bush wasn't in power...the attack would not be a surprise...he had numerous FBI reports

2004-12-09 [Ylaraniala Majere]: Everyone keeps saying "He had a lot of FBI reports" "He had numerous FBI reports" "When he was at his home in Texas he got FBI reports".... may I have some proof please, because I didn't hear about this until much much after Sept. 11. In fact, I only started hearing about it after we went to war and people started pointing fingers. Please, some proof here.

2004-12-09 [Balthizar]: listen, the reports were jsut rumors, the FBI gets those all the time but they have to figure out which ines will actually happen.This is the first time they screwerd up so stop it

2004-12-09 [Doormat]: umm...can you confirm that they were rumors plz?

2004-12-09 [Balthizar]: it was on CBS news one night during 2003

2004-12-09 [Doormat]: really....one night eh?

2004-12-09 [Balthizar]: it has been on several times but not lately due to hte fact that it isnt brought up anymore

2004-12-10 [Doormat]: lol...due to the staggering evidence of actual reports?

2004-12-10 [Balthizar]: the reprots all say the same thing, The FBi discredited them because they have gottent eh reports many time before, and each time htat had investigated and prepared htemselves it turnd out to be false.Now,in hte actual that they got right before the towers fell it said it would be by bomb not palne, htey had bomb crews there but there never was a bomb it haad been a ruse

2004-12-10 [Ylaraniala Majere]: I'm curious Diablo, where did you hear about the reports?

2004-12-11 [Doormat]: newspaper

2005-01-18 [Maurer's conclusions]: It is a well known fact that there were reports. Have you read the official documents on investigation of the 9/11 attack?

2005-01-18 [Balthizar]: *Plays "have you forgotten" and then plays "where were you?"*

2005-02-10 [farfy girl]: I'm not too into country music, but "have you forgotten" has some great lyrics. ^_^

2005-02-10 [Ylaraniala Majere]: Yeah it does XD

2005-03-01 [Ri'hala]: "Bush said that we should keep marriage the way it's supposed to be. Last time I chacked, marriage was about love, and it should stay that way." He wants marriage to stay hetero sexual because that is the definition of marriage; a union of a man and a woman. He actually said he has no problem with Gay couples attaining Civil Unions, which is technically the exact same thing as marriage. www.answers.com/topic/civil-union A defintion of Civil Union, since a few people have asked me what the exact definition is.

2005-03-01 [Maurer's conclusions]: Do you think that Church should be separate from the state?

2005-03-01 [Ylaraniala Majere]: Yes, but it should not be forced to be separated from the minds IN the government, just like you should not force environmentalists or those who believe in magic etc from believing in that just because they are in the state. A minister should be able to be president just as much as a businessman. Religion is part of who a person is, just like hope and love and pain.

2005-03-24 [Ri'hala]: EXACTLY, Ylara ^^.

2005-04-25 [Balthizar]: i have a prob with one of the above postings

2005-04-25 [Balthizar]: Unlike heterosexual sex, which is necessary to continue the human race, sodomy entertains its participants, but contributes nothing in return. Most heterosexuals die after contributing financially to society, where the opposite is true of most homosexuals, who (because of HIV and STD infections) die at a much earlier age, and before contributing financially to society.

2005-04-25 [Balthizar]: it says there that basically all Gays and Bi's get HIV and STD's,that is not true,while im not gay or Bi...im still insulted by the lie

2005-04-25 [Radioactive Flea]: It's statistically based love from an exteme liberal. You should be more concerned with the real lies thrown about by our schools and media.

2005-04-25 [Balthizar]: i am not a Liberal,im Me,i agree on many things from Dem and Rep, it depnds on the evidnece given to me but still...its not right saying all Gays and Bi's get HIV and STD's,they dont even have a higher chance of getting unless they go have sex with a monkey.

2005-04-25 [Radioactive Flea]: Maybe you should do a bit more research.

2005-04-25 [Ylaraniala Majere]: Yeah, I actually agree on this one. They don't tend to get STDs unless they have sex with too many people.

2005-04-25 [Balthizar]: I will,but it does that change the fact that,that posting is wrong and a lie

2005-04-25 [Radioactive Flea]: Sorry to say, it's not. One tends to do research before sluffing off something as a lie.

2005-04-25 [Balthizar]: so you are saying,if my friend Melody makes love to her gf she is going to get STD's and die?

2005-04-25 [Ylaraniala Majere]: OI, Radioactive, watch it, k? That was pretty close to a flame.

2005-04-25 [Balthizar]: i did do some research,and no where did it say that Gays get STD's just because they make love t each other

2005-04-25 [Ylaraniala Majere]: I've done some research too and STDs are from sex, if one person has an STD then it doesn't matter whether they're heterosexual or homosexual sex, the person who didn't have the STD before has a very high chance of getting it if they have sex with that person.

2005-04-25 [Balthizar]: yes,but it says up there: where the opposite is true of most homosexuals, who (because of HIV and STD infections) die at a much earlier age, and before contributing financially to society. that si either worded badly or its saying Gays and BI's always die from HIV and STD's

2005-04-25 [Radioactive Flea]: First of all, do not predefine understanding, and do not make a principle of non-understanding. Any and all licentious actions do lead to contracting of stds.

2005-04-25 [Balthizar]: what?

2005-04-25 [Maurer's conclusions]: •  Since same sex marriage was legalized in Scandinavia, Hoover Institution researcher Stanley Kurtz has documented that 80% of first born children are now born out of wedlock, and 60% of children born there-after are born to unwed parents, indicating that people now believe there is no need for heterosexuals to marry to legitimize parenthood.

2005-04-25 [Maurer's conclusions]: I, being a Scandinavian, have reasons to believe that these figures are highly exaggerated. What are their sources?

2005-04-25 [Ylaraniala Majere]: Check it out with Hoover Institution.... and yeah, that is worded badly.....

2005-04-25 [Maurer's conclusions]: I'm not going to trust 'figures' from such a biased think tank...

2005-04-25 [Ylaraniala Majere]: Maybe you should research it on your own. Would be an interesting project to find out if it's actually true? I haven't really the opportunity as I do not live in Scandinavia.

2005-04-25 [Maurer's conclusions]: I searched on the Hoover institutes website and found nothing like that... One problem with the survey could be that it only talks about marriage, not civil unions.

2005-04-25 [Radioactive Flea]: I'd like to go out into the world and research everything I've ever taken a liking to.

2005-04-25 [Ylaraniala Majere]: Well actually, since the entire problem now is about marriage it seems to make sense they would only research the statistics for marriage. And yes, me too Radioactive.

2005-04-25 [Radioactive Flea]: Though I'll die before my hunger is sufficed.

2005-05-24 [chasingpeace]: hmn...seems like no one cares about opinions anymore...

2005-05-25 [Ylaraniala Majere]: Course we do. Just isn't booming as much as it used to...

2005-05-25 [chasingpeace]: exactly.

2005-05-25 [Doormat]: Maybe because you don't let us have our opinions...meh

2005-05-25 [Ylaraniala Majere]: I do, but sometimes you (collectively) insult people as you say your opinions, and that's not right. For anyone.

2005-05-25 [Radioactive Flea]: Opinions are alright as long as they mesh with mine ;-)P.

2005-05-25 [Ylaraniala Majere]: *rolls eyes* Now come on, people prefer to have others agree with them but really... people disagreeing isn't that bad as long as they have real reasons for it.

2005-05-26 [chasingpeace]: yes...hmn...

2005-05-26 [Radioactive Flea]: My earlier comment was seeping with sarcasm.

2005-05-26 [chasingpeace]: obviously, it was indicated by the ";-)P"

2005-11-26 [Ego Diligo Tu]: On the Gay Marrige Note. Over 50% of Gay couples who get married or have civil unions have children from previous marraiges or adopt children. SO if you want to say they do not conribute you are sorely wrong. They adopt more children then hetrosexual people. And on the scandoniva thing, Did they really reasearh on that much in recent times? Most people have been having children out of wedlock for a while. And as bush being as great as apparently a vast amount of people think so why then is he one of the only presidents who went into the election with a criminal record? ANd why is becoming a modern day hitler by trying to get rid of certain people who are 'wrong' (gays.islams,etc)

2005-11-26 [Ylaraniala Majere]: Which criminal record? I have not heard of this before. Um, Bush is trying to PROTECT the Islams, only kill the terrorists. He also suggested that homosexuals have unions instead of marriages. Where is your proof for the rest of it? Sites?

2006-01-16 [Doormat]: Wow, if that wasn't an enraged flame, I don't know what is. And for the matter of backing information, where did the random idea of Communist Funded Liberals come from? If Liberals are funded by Communists, then are Conservatives funded by Fascists? Think about it.

2006-01-17 [Ylaraniala Majere]: Radioactive Flea, one warning for breaking Rule #1.

2006-01-22 [Radioactive Flea]: I said nothing in an antogonistic fashion. So therefore I broke no rule. If I did the rule needs rephrasing.

2006-01-22 [Doormat]: Of course not. That's why your comment got deleted and you warned.

2006-01-22 [Radioactive Flea]: Honestly I think I couldn't care less at this point in time. Try again when raging apathy has passed. Thank you and come again.

2006-02-03 [Doormat]: Raging apathy you say. Where did that come from?, pairing two "word of the days" together? Despite the fact that "raging apathy" is a complete oxymoron and a paradox, it just doesn't make sense. So you're saying that i'm angrily, furiously, showing lack of interest/concern or emotion. So you're calling me an angry impassive person? Look things up before you call me something because denoucning someone is useless unless you know what you're saying.

2006-02-04 [chasingpeace]: i think they meant it to be any oxymoron and it to be their 'raging apathy'...not yours. Kinof like saying, ' i have so much apathy right now that i wont even be able to read what you wanted to say"...raging apathy...

2006-02-04 [chasingpeace]: do people think that all homosexuals have AIDS or STDs? that's just plain stupid.

2006-02-06 [Radioactive Flea]: Exactly zansola. Diablo is sans humor.

2006-02-07 [Doormat]: So you needed someone else to explain it for you...Anyway...J'ai d'autre chat a foutter.

2006-02-09 [chasingpeace]: you mean me explianing it to you becuase you don;t have a sense of humor...i think you might have just tried to insult yourslef. That one french sentence has the word cat in it...i think...

2006-04-17 [Maurer's conclusions]: Heh I love how this page criticises Scandinavia, when the standard of living is far better there than in places such as the US...

2006-04-17 [chasingpeace]: Scandinavia? *scans* noope....

2006-04-18 [Maurer's conclusions]: "•  Since same sex marriage was legalized in Scandinavia, Hoover Institution researcher Stanley Kurtz has documented that 80% of first born children are now born out of wedlock, and 60% of children born there-after are born to unwed parents, indicating that people now believe there is no need for heterosexuals to marry to legitimize parenthood."